Who Has Burden of Proof?
One of the basic rules of argument (I’ll call it friendly discussion) is that whoever makes the claim bears the burden of proof.
This is very helpful to remember. Let’s see how it works and how it can get confusing.
Suppose I’m talking with an atheist friend, and I claim that the Bible’s New Testament is a very reliable account of first century events. I’ve just put a claim on the table, and I should be prepared to support it. If I can’t, it’s really only my opinion.
But I’m not the only one who can be put on the spot. The rules apply to both sides. If my friend states that God does not exist, he’s just put a claim on the table himself. I have every right to expect him to support that claim.
Now what if my friend tells me that since we can’t see God, it’s up to me to prove that God exists? Well, he’s trying to change the rules. I didn’t make the claim. He did. My friend bears the burden of proof that God does not exist.
At this point is seems as though my friend’s best evidence that God does not exist is that we can’t see God. That’s not very strong, honestly. There are many things we can’t see, but we know they exist. Like electricity. We know by their effects.
And by the way, we’re always safe if we avoid actually putting a claim on the table. Just ask a lot of questions. This is a great way to learn about what other people believe.
So when having a friendly discussion with others, have fun. Talk about your opinions and beliefs. Ask questions. Put a claim on the table if you feel like it—but be prepared to support it. And if your friend puts a claim on the table, press for evidence.
Above all, don’t get too serious. Enjoy the conversation, and back off a little if you need to. Your relationship may be more important than the issue at hand.